First, often the most powerful elements in our environment remain invisible
to us.
“Work procedures, job layouts, reporting structures, etc., don’t exactly walk
up and whisper in our ear.” The environment affects much of what we do, but we
often fail to notice its impact.
Second, even when we do think about it, we aren’t sure we know how it is
impacting us or we may not know what to do about it.
Students spend much of their waking youth in school. 12-13 years, 180 days a
year, 6 hours a day, in school. More specifically, they spend this time in
their classrooms, at their desks, sitting in a chair.
I have been thinking and reading a lot about Design Thinking. In his book
Change By Design, author and IDEO CEO Tim Brown says that a prerequisite for
creative cultures, “…is an environment—social but also spatial—in which people
know they can experiment, take risks, and explore the full range of their
faculties.”
He goes on to say that, “They physical and the psychological spaces of an
organization work in tandem to define that effectiveness of the people within
it.”
12-13 years sitting in a chair. Do you think the type of chair students
spend the majority of their youth influences behavior? It is possible that the
type of chair might impact the approximately 13,000 to 14,000 hours spent
sitting in it?
The pinnacle of educational design seems to be the plastic chair. Does that
chair say something about our educational system?
Maybe it says, “This as good as it gets.” Or it might say, “We do what we
have always done because it works.” Possibly it says, “The reliability of the
past is more important than the validity of our current situation.”
But what if we allowed design thinking to create a new chair, a new system? Which
would make the most positive influence on behaviors in the classroom? Which one
do our students deserve to spend the majority of their waking hours as a child?
What is our school environment saying about our priorities? Which would you
rather spend your time in learning?
Which would you rather sit in?
Actually, design thinking suggests that we first challenge the assumption that a chair is needed at all : )
And you've taken 'design' out of context. There are all sorts of factors involved, and cost is obviously one of them.
Your suggestion is one taken by many 'designerly' types -- but is not design thinking.
Posted by: twitter.com/rotkapchen | January 26, 2010 at 06:56 AM
The fact you are talking about the chair means you missed the metaphor the chair represents. I am not actually talking about a chair, but the system the chair represents. If education is a human process, then it needs a blend of the analytical thinking and intuitive thinking that Roger Martin describes in The Design of Business. Education is a human focus endeavor, it meets a human need. The current system does not meet the needs of the humans it is intended to serve, and is shaped by constraints and a status quo that must be overcome. That is at the heart of design thinking.
Posted by: Rob Jacobs | January 26, 2010 at 07:25 PM