Does your date of birth make a difference in how well you do as a student? If you asked Malcom Gladwell the answer would be yes. Kindergarten teachers have known this for years. It is called Accumulative Advantage.
by dswinburne
Accumulative Advantage is when a small advantage at the beginning of something, such as kindergarten, becomes a little difference that leads to an opportunity that makes a bigger difference a bit bigger, and that edge in turns leads to another opportunity, which makes that initial small difference even bigger. The effect creates a growing separation between to people who started at the same place but end in very different places due to the increased accumulative advantage over time.
According to author Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers, you can see Accumulative Advantage in play in education based on cut off dates for Kindergarten. Those who are the oldest entering Kindergarten have an accumulative advantage over those students who are very close to the cut off. Gladwell suggest schools try to mitigate this advantage and attempt to prevent those without the accumulated advantage failing at a greater rate.
“Elementary and middle schools could put the January through April-born students in one class, the May through August in another class, and those born in September through December in the third class. They could let students learn with and compete against other students of the same maturity level.”
Leave aside the obvious scheduling difficulties and what happens after kindergarten and focus on the idea. Most of us in education have known that if a student is questionable in maturity, it is better to allow the student to wait a year and allow the developmental issues to work themselves out so they student could enter kinder on a more equal footing with his or her peers. Structuring a school around birth dates might make a difference for students as they grow and develop.
It is an interesting question? What impact would structuring a school around date of birth have on the student learning? How might students benefit from being in class with students who are from a very narrow developmental range? What impact might this have on early literacy?
Accounting for Accumulative Advantage in students? That’s Education Innovation.
A fascinating question, and it makes sense to me. I had a February baby who was one of the oldest in his class, and a November baby, whom I held back a year. As I teacher of middle school/ninth-grade students, I see the issues younger students face both socially and academically. But what a huge shift for schools to think about. My oh my.
Posted by: Susan Carter Morgan | December 04, 2008 at 02:57 PM
I haven't read the book, so I may be totally off-base here, but I was always one of the youngest students in my class, my birthday being at the end of September, just before the cutoff date in my state at the time.
I've always thought of myself as mature for my age and after reading your post, I'm wondering if it is because I was always surrounded by older, more mature students. And I'm not sure that's a bad thing. I'm also not sure if this directly related to the point Gladwell is trying to make, but you post got me thinking and I wanted to share my experience.
Posted by: | December 04, 2008 at 05:34 PM
Susan, thanks for sharing your experiences with your children. Yes, what a shift it would be for education. 3 tracks for each grade level. Can you imagine what education would look like and what it would take to get it there? Thanks for your comments.
Posted by: Rob Jacobs | December 04, 2008 at 07:15 PM