Professional Learning Communities on the rocks!
Professional Learning Communities should be put on I.C.E. Education Innovation’s definition of on the rocks actually means on I.C.E. cubes. An I.C.E cube is an acronym for Innovation, Imagination, Creativity, Collaboration, Experimentation, and Exploration. The six traits form the cube, the I.C.E. cube.
In his book Group Genius, Keith Sawyer describes 10 conditions that must exist for group flow to emerge. Today we will look at conditions 1-5.
1. The Groups Goal
“One study of more than five hundred professionals and managers in thirty companies found that unclear objectives became the biggest barrier to effective team performance.”
If you grade level teams, departments, or PLC’s don’t know what they are meeting about and what they are expected to achieve, results are going to be poor.
The principal or chair of the group needs to manage what I call the Innovative Goal Paradox. That is, you want to be clear on the objective that must be achieved or the product produced, but flexible on the means the group achieves it. It’s like telling them the destination on a map, but leaving it up to the group to determine the route, time of travel, method of travel, etc.
2. Close Listening
Are your PLC teams listening to each other?
“Group flow is more likely to emerge when everyone is full engaged—what improvisers call ‘deep listening,’ in which member of the group don’t plan ahead what they’re going to say, but their statements are genuinely unplanned responses to what they hear.”
Let the student work, data, etc. drive the dialogue. Don’t come in with preconceived ideas.
“Innovation is blocked when one (or more) of the participants already has a preconceived idea of how to reach the goal…”
3. Complete Concentration
Time is valuable, especially when you are taking time from the teachers to have them meet in their PLC groups. You want to maximize the use of the time to honor the participants and the process.
Deadlines are not a productive tool for developing innovative ideas. Similarly, keep distractions away from meetings.
“Group flow is more likely when a group can draw a boundary, however temporary or virtual, between the group’s activity and everything else.”
4. Being In Control
“Many studies have found that team autonomy is the top predictor of team performance. But in group flow, unlike solo flow, control results in a paradox because participants must feel in control, yet at the same time they must remain flexible, listen closely, and always be willing to defer to the emergent flow of the group. The most innovative teams are the ones that can manage the paradox.”
This is one of the toughest to get for teachers because they work in isolation and have much autonomy and control of what they want to do. In the PLC, teachers will need practice letting go of control individually, while being allowed to have control of the process.
5. Blending Egos
“In group flow, each person’s idea builds on those just contributed by his or her colleagues.
In other words, everyone needs to contribute to get the best result or idea for how to meet the needs of students. Everyone!
Catalytic Questions:
In what ways might technology be used to enhance these 5 conditions?
How might the organization of your school’s PLC need to change to achieve these 5 conditions?
What probing question could you ask of your grade level or department PLC’s to determine the level of these 5 conditions being present?
What is your hunch about these conditions in your PLC’s?
In what ways could you better focus your time and energy to ensure these conditions exist?
How might you question your assumptions about your PLC’s and investigate what is truly happening?
In what ways might you adapt these conditions to your PLC’s?
How might you put existing time for teacher planning, meetings, etc. to better use and increase PLC time?
Recommended Reading:
The Vision-less Learning Community.-Tempered Radical blog
Recent Comments