Changing Education Paradigms- Sir Ken Robinson

Comments

[Augusto]

It makes sense that our education is in the last century when the company still define success the same way as in the nineteenth century. Even if the economic situation is different and we are trained in divergent thinking rather than convergent thinking ... agree, this is not a paradigm shift is a change from one bottle to another, because the two seem equally valid and, although combined, insufficient to represent our complex thinking skills.

Success is no longer related to how you become academic, but as you climb the social ladder and, in this paradigm, the economic ladder. If this makes you a successful person today has changed the paradigm that we are not educated. It makes no difference if the lesson is the old or divergent thinking. One who goes to school does not define the very purpose of going to school, the paradigm is the same.

The creation of an educational process that defines why you have to study still makes sense with the success parameters of our society and will not change until our measure of success change. Education in these terms is the old paradigm. We have to increase the educational standard, is that we recontextualize the learning spaces we create definitions of success by combining the collective and the individual learner and their environment.

From http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=pt&tl=en&u=http://augustocuginotti.com/paradigma_educacao&act=url